Possible link between PFAS and diabetes in women

Possible link between PFAS and diabetes in women


By Will Atwater

Eastern North Carolina has some of the highest rates of diabetes in the state. 

There are two forms of diabetes – type 1 and type 2. Type 1 diabetes is a genetic disorder in which the immune system destroys insulin producing cells needed to regulate blood sugar levels. Type 2 diabetes occurs when the body is unable to produce enough insulin to regulate blood sugar levels. Factors associated with type 2 diabetes include diet, exercise and environment. 

In 2020, the U.S. diabetes average was 10.6 percent, while the North Carolina average was 12.4 percent, according to American Health Rankings 2021 Annual Report. During this same period, the annual County Health Rankings report noted that Columbus County recorded a 19 percent diabetes rate, Pender County was at 15 percent and Brunswick showed a rate of 14 percent. These counties are a part of the lower Cape Fear River Basin.

That’s why it’s worrisome that a recent study suggests that middle-aged women exposed to “forever chemicals” may be at a higher risk of contracting the disease. 

Those forever chemicals are per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). They’re a family of synthetic chemicals that includes more than 4,700 substances, none of which are federally regulated. They’ve been a subject of scrutiny in eastern North Carolina since 2017, when researchers found that the Chemours chemical facility near Fayetteville had been dumping one of the PFAS chemicals known as GenX into the Cape Fear River for decades. 

A key point in the findings, published in the journal Diabetologia, is that women who were exposed to a mixture of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are at a higher risk of developing diabetes than the women who were exposed to only one of the chemicals.

The study’s authors wrote that this finding suggested, “a synergistic effect of multiple PFAS on diabetes risk.” 

Based at the University of Michigan, the researchers tracked a mixed race group of 1,237 women with a median age of 49.4. They followed them for 17 years, from the turn of the century until 2017. Four out of five of the women had at least some college education.

The researchers found that of the overall group studied, Black women who were less educated, less physically active, had a larger energy intake and higher BMI at baseline, were more likely to develop diabetes than the other participants. 

Non-stick chemicals stick around

PFAS have been manufactured and used by industries worldwide since the 1940s, used in everything from Teflon pans to raincoats to dental floss. They are also used in firefighting foams.

The two most extensively produced and studied, PFOA and PFOS, have been phased out in the U.S., but they don’t break down easily and can accumulate in the environment and in human bodies, hence the moniker “forever chemicals.” There is a growing body of evidence that exposure to PFAS can lead to adverse human health effects.

Although all the health effects of PFAS are still not completely clear, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says they are believed to impact the immune system and may reduce antibody responses to vaccines, including those for COVID-19.

Additionally, studies on laboratory animals have found a link between PFAS and liver, kidney, testicular, pancreas and thyroid cancer. Studies also suggest that PFAS can cause high cholesterol, pregnancy problems and immune suppression. 

The study’s researchers suspect that the molecular structures of different PFAS mimic naturally occurring fatty acids. Those fatty acids trigger receptors in the body’s cells that are sensitive to fat and insulin and control the formation and development of fat cells. Those receptors also exercise control of the body’s fat and blood sugar levels. 

If PFAS chemicals are fooling the fat and insulin receptors in cells, that could disrupt their behavior and suggest a possible way that these substances affect diabetes risk.

In other words, there may be environmental factors beyond one’s ability to control diet and exercise, for instance, that contribute to diabetes risk factors, the research suggests. 

A call to action

The Lower Cape Fear River Basin, which provides drinking water to Columbus, Pender and Brunswick counties, among others, is contaminated with a class of PFAS known as GenX. 

There are more than 257,000 people living in these three counties, which have diabetes rates of 19 percent, 15 percent and 14 percent respectively. In contrast, the state’s two largest counties, Mecklenburg and Wake, have diabetes rates of 8 percent and 9 percent respectively. 

The study may offer insights into certain public health issues in this region.

Credit: CDC

North Carolina State University epidemiologist Jane Hoppin believes the study – though started several years before North Carolina began tracking PFAS – has overlap with respect to certain legacy chemicals and is worth attention. 

“While this is a [study] with older samples, it could be particularly relevant to people in North Carolina because our levels [of exposure] 22 years later, are like this general population sample [from] 20 years ago,” she said.

Donald A. McClain, an endocrinologist at Wake Forest University School of Medicine, says that while the Michigan study is compelling, there are likely several other factors that contribute to a diabetes diagnosis, including diet, genetic disposition and environmental factors. 

On the other hand, McClain acknowledged this study contributes to a growing body of research that points to the negative effects of human exposure to forever chemicals. He believes it is not too soon to act.

“I would not be sad if the political and social response to this [study] was maybe even a little bit ahead of science,” he said. “If I’m suddenly 75 percent sure, do I want to wait 10 years and be 99 percent sure?” 

“And after 10 years, how many people have [been harmed]?”

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

X

Republish this article

As of late 2019, we’re changing our policy about reprinting our content.

You are free to use NC Health News content under the following conditions:

  • You can copy and paste this html tracking code into articles of ours that you use, this little snippet of code allows us to track how many people read our story.




  • Please do not reprint our stories without our bylines, and please include a live link to NC Health News under the byline, like this:

    By Jane Doe

    North Carolina Health News



  • Finally, at the bottom of the story (whether web or print), please include the text:

    North Carolina Health News is an independent, non-partisan, not-for-profit, statewide news organization dedicated to covering all things health care in North Carolina. Visit NCHN at northcarolinahealthnews.org. (on the web, this can be hyperlinked)

1



Source link