Apple’s Vision Pro headset, positioned as a forerunner in spatial computing, is not just constrained by the technical challenges of hardware but also by Apple’s closed ecosystem approach. The device, which aims to be the computer of the future, is built within the paradigm of the present tech mindset that focuses on consolidation, closed ecosystems, and zero-sum game platforms. Despite its technical prowess, the Vision Pro faces limitations due to its inability to stream Netflix or watch videos on YouTube natively. This is largely attributed to the tense relationships between Apple and major players like Google, Netflix, and Epic Games.
The closed ecosystem approach, which has been a hallmark of Apple’s strategy, is reflected in the Vision Pro’s reliance on a restricted set of apps and content. For instance, the absence of Epic Games’ projects, such as Unreal Engine and Infinity Blade, underscores the challenges posed by Apple’s closed environment. The limitations become more evident in the absence of certain content, such as fitness applications, despite Apple’s focus on health and wellness. The closed platform also puts constraints on third-party developers, creating a challenging environment for the growth of diverse and independent applications.
The tension between Apple and other tech giants has become more pronounced, especially in the context of ongoing legal battles and antitrust issues. While Apple attempts to extend its closed ecosystem to the Vision Pro, it faces resistance from developers and platforms that have clashed with the company over control, fees, and restrictions. The Vision Pro’s closed approach raises questions about the future of computing devices and whether the walled garden model is suited for the evolving landscape of spatial computing. As Apple navigates these challenges, users and developers await a more open and collaborative approach that fosters innovation and diversity in the emerging spatial computing era.